Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»ó¾Çµ¿¿°¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸

A Comparative Study of Radiographic Images of Maxillary Sinusitisesuth : Nam-Gyu Song, Kwang-Joon Kohesosock : Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University-Abstract- The purpose of this studywas toeva

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1997³â 27±Ç 1È£ p.283 ~ 295
¼Û³²±Ô, Á¶ÀÎÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼Û³²±Ô (  ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
Á¶ÀÎÈ£ (  ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç

Abstract

ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ º´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±°ú¿¡ ³»¿øÇÑ È¯ÀÚ Áß ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î »ó¾Çµ¿¿°ÀÌ ÀǽɵǴÂ
ȯÀÚ, °ú°Å »ó¾Çµ¿ °ü·Ã º´·ÂÀÌ Àִ ȯÀÚ ±×¸®°í Æijë¶ó¸¶¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø»ó ¹× »ó¾Ç ±¸Ä¡ºÎ Ä¡
±Ù´Ü¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø»ó¿¡¼­ »ó¾Çµ¿¿°ÀÌ ÀǽɵǴ ȯÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© À̵éÀÇ Àǹ«±â·ÏÁö¿Í ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø
»óÀ» ºñ±³ °ËÅäÇÏ¿© »ó¾Çµ¿¿°À¸·Î Áø´ÜµÈ 495¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. 990°³ »ó¾Çµ¿Áß¿¡¼­ Á¡¸·ÀÇ ºñÈĸ¦ º¸ÀÎ °æ¿ì°¡ 505·Ê(51.0%)À̾úÀ¸¸ç, »ó¾Çµ¿Àú¿Í Ãø
º® ¿¡ Á¡¸·ÀÌ ºñÈÄµÈ °æ¿ì°¡ 125·Ê(24.8%)À̾ú°í, »ó¾Çµ¿ÀÇ Àü º®¿¡ Á¡¸·ÀÌ ±ÕÀÏÇÏ°Ô ºñÈÄ
µÈ °æ¿ì°¡ 106·Ê(20.9%), Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ¹æ»ç¼±ºÒÅõ°ú¼ºÀÌ Áõ°¡µÈ °æ¿ì°¡ 75·Ê(14.8%)À̾ú´Ù.
2. Á¡¸·ÀÌ ºñÈÄµÈ 505·ÊÁß 319·Ê(63.2%)¿¡¼­ °ñº®ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÌ Áß¿¡¼­ °ñº®ÀÌ
¾ã¾ÆÁø °æ¿ì°¡ 114·Ê(35.9%)À̾ú°í, µÎ²¨¿öÁø °æ¿ì´Â 105·Ê(32.8%)À̾úÀ¸¸ç, »ó¾Çµ¿ °ñº®ÀÌ
ºÒ¸íÈ®ÇÑ °æ¿ì´Â 47·Ê(14.7%)À̾ú´Ù.
3. Á¡¸·ºñÈÄÀÇ 6ÇüÅ Áß Àü »ó¾Çµ¿ÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±ºÒÅõ°ú»óÀ» º¸ÀÎ °æ¿ì°¡ 75·Ê Áß 56·Ê(73.3%)
·Î °¡Àå ¸¹Àº °ñº®º¯È­¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, Àü °ñº®¿¡¼­ Á¡¸·ºñÈĸ¦ º¸ÀÎ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â 67·ÊÁß 48·Ê
(71.6%)¿¡¼­ °ñº®º¯È­°¡ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù.
4. »ó¾Ç±¸Ä¡ºÎ Æijë¶ó¸¶¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø»ó°ú Ä¡±Ù´Ü¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø»ó¿¡¼­ »ó¾Çµ¿ÀúÀÇ º´ÀûÀÎ º¯È­
¸¦ °üÂûÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø¾ú´ø °æ¿ì´Â 139·Ê (25.1%)À̾úÀ¸¸ç, ºÒ¸í·áÇÑ »ó¾Çµ¿Àú¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³½ °æ¿ì´Â
127·Ê(22.9%), »ó¾Çµ¿ÀúÀÇ 'Halo' »óÀ» º¸ÀÎ °æ¿ì´Â 122·Ê (22.1%)À̾ú´Ù.
»ó¾Çµ¿ÀúÀÇ º¯È­¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ Ä¡¾ÆÁß¿¡¼­ »ó¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡ °¡ 415·ÊÁß 271·Ê(65.3%), »ó¾Ç Á¦
2 ´ë±¸Ä¡°¡ 118·Ê(28.4%)¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
5. Waters»çÁø»ó¿¡¼­ »ó¾Çµ¿ÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±ºÒÅõ°ú¼ºÀÇ Áõ°¡¸¦ ¶Ñ·ÇÀÌ °üÂûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´ø °æ¿ì´Â
505·ÊÁß 449·Ê(88.9%), ÀǽɵǴ °æ¿ì´Â 47·Ê(9.3%)·Î »ó¾Çµ¿¿°À» ÀǽÉÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì´Â
98.2%¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
Æijë¶ó¸¶¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø»ó¿¡¼­ »ó¾Çµ¿ÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±ºÒÅõ°ú¼ºÀÇ Áõ°¡¸¦ ¶ÑfutÀÌ °üÂûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´ø
°æ¿ì´Â 391·ÊÁß 280·Ê(71.6%), ÀǽɵǴ °æ¿ì´Â 88·Ê(22.5%)·Î »ó¾Çµ¿¿°À» ÀǽÉÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â
°æ¿ì´Â 94.1%¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
Ä¡±Ù´Ü¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø»ó¿¡¼­ »ó¾Çµ¿ÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±ºÒÅõ°ú¼ºÀÇ Áõ°¡¸¦ ¶ÑfutÀÌ °üÂûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´ø °æ
¿ì´Â 387·ÊÁß 141·Ê(36.4%), ÀǽɵǴ °æ¿ì´Â 133·Ê(34.4%)·Î »ó¾Çµ¿¿°À» ÀǽÉÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´ø
°æ¿ì´Â 70.8% À̾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Waters'views, panoramic and periapical
radiograms as well as clinical symptoms in the diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis.
The author analyzed the types of mucosal thickenings, the types of bony wall
changes, the pathologic changes of antral floors and total amount of agreement on
radiograms in 495 patients with 505 maxillary sinuses which demonstrated radiographic
changes.
The results were obtained as follows :
1. 125 cases (24.8%) showed the mucosal thickening of antral floor and lateral
wall(Type II), 106 cases (20.9%) showed the mucosal thickening around the whole antral
wall(Type IV) and 75 cases (14.8%) showed increased radiopacity of whole antrum.
2. Among 505 cases of mucosal thickenings, 319 cases(63.2%) showed the bony wall
changes : 114 cases (35.9%) showed the thinning of lateral walls, 105 cases (32.8%)
showed the thickening of lateral walls and 47 cases(14.7%) showed indistinct antral
walls.
3. Among 6 types of mucosal thickenings, the incidence of bony wall changes was
high in type VI(73.3%) and in type ¥³(71.6%).
4. 139 cases(25.1%) showed no pathologic change of antral floor, 127 cases(22.9%)
showed the indistinct antral floor and 122 cases (22.1%) showed the halo appearance of
antral floor on panoramic and periapical radiograms.
5. 449 cases (88.9%) showed apparent increased radiopacity and 47 cases(9.3%)
showed suspicious increased radiopacity on Waters'views.
280 cases (71.6%) showed apparent increased radiopacity and 88 cases (22.5%) showed
suspicious increased radiopacity on panoramic radiograms.
And 141 cases (31.6%) showed apparent increased radiopacity and 133 cases(33.4%)
showed suspicious increased radiopacity on periapical radiograms.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸